The Dumbest and Most Dangerous Startup Financing

Home » Blog » The Dumbest and Most Dangerous Startup Financing

Dumbo Corp is a 2-year old startup that recently started selling product to a few large customers.  They have 30 employees and a $250K monthly payroll.  The employees are paid on a monthly basis and Dumbo runs its own payroll through QuickBooks.   

Recently, Dumbo ran into a serious cash flow problem due to a late-paying customer. To bridge the cash flow problem, they delayed paying the IRS $50K in payroll taxes just withheld from the employees’ most recent paycheck. The customer said they would pay within a week and Dumbo would then make the IRS whole.

You know the rest of the story – customer never pays, cash flow problems get worse, Dumbo continues to fund operations with employees’ payroll taxes, Dumbo goes bankrupt.

Now, why is financing operations, when there is a cash flow problem, by not paying the IRS “the dumbest and most dangerous startup financing”?  Big companies often string out vendors to fund operations.  Plus, in a worst-case scenario, bankruptcy dissolves all debts and the corporate veil personally protects employees – right?  No one going to jail here – right?

Wrong and wrong.  Corporate bankruptcy will not discharge this type of IRS tax debt. Even personal bankruptcy will not discharge this type of IRS tax debt.  The IRS will chase you forever.  Plus, the corporate veil is pierced very easily by not paying the IRS.

For trust fund taxes (i.e., withheld payroll taxes), the IRS holds every “responsible person” personally and criminally liable for “willfully” failing to ensure that payroll taxes are paid.  They move very quickly when a quarterly payroll tax return is not filed or there is a payroll tax deficiency. They can demand full payment from any “responsible person” without first trying to collect the payment from the employer or other “responsible persons”.

Oh by the way, a “responsible person” is broadly defined as anyone with substantial authority over business operations even if somebody else has the ultimate authority over which bills get paid.  The IRS has successfully prosecuted CEOs to AP clerks under this “responsible person” definition.

The penalty becomes criminal when a “responsible person” intentionally violates a legal duty – knowingly not remitting withheld payroll taxes.

So, any “responsible person” at Dumbo who knew the IRS was not being paid while vendors, such as the landlord or electric company were being paid is personally and criminally liable.

The IRS process always starts with a notice.  If you receive one regarding payroll taxes – do not take it lightly, even if you never had a payroll.  Get professional help (preferably a CPA) to respond to the notice immediately.  The IRS acts very quickly, including personal visits to the business and bank account liens.

(One fool-proof way to avoid this temptation and a good business practice is never to do your own payroll.  Use a payroll service provider, such as MassPay, Paychex or ADP).

 

___________________________________________________________________________

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this document is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter that is contained in this document.

 

Related Posts

  • http://smart-drugs.net/carnosine-eyedrops-testimonials.htm Can-C Eye Drops

    Pretty much everyone who has a job pays Social Security and Medicare taxes under FICA , the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, though some student workers are exempt and individuals who are self-employed pay a variation that I’ll get to in a second. The Social Security tax rate is usually 6.2% but was temporarily dropped to 4.2% for 2011 and 2012, and in 2011 is only levied on the first $106,800 of gross income for a limit of $4,485.60. Since any wages above the $106,800 cap isn’t taxed at all, people pay a progressively lower overall rate the more money they make; for example, someone earning a million dollars would only pay about 0.45%. For this reason, it’s considered a regressive tax. Medicare taxes are an additional 1.45% with no upper cap. Employers also pay these taxes in addition to what was taken out of the salary for a total of another 7.65% (they didn’t get the temporary SS tax discount but the cap still applies so the percentage is lower for higher-wage employees). The tax on people who are self-employed is more complicated, with them paying the combined employee and employer taxes but with some finagling and income tax deductions to make it work out fairly.

  • http://www.anglofareast.com/bullion-accounts/silver-account/ silver account

    The scheme involves a type of business called an “S corporation,” which is distinguished from other corporations in that its profits are not subject to the corporate income tax but are simply included in the taxable income of the owners and therefore subject to the personal income tax. These profits should also be subject to payroll taxes when they are income from work, but an odd feature of S corporations allows some “active income” (income a business owner receives as a result of being involved in the operations of the business) to be characterized as income that is not earned and thus not subject to payroll taxes.

  • http://smart-drugs.net/JamesSouth-piracetam.htm Piracetam

    Small businesses often find themselves faced with a cash flow crisis, one they believe will ease in a matter of days or weeks. The business owner who, when faced with this cash flow problem, decides to pay vendors before paying for payroll tax obligations is making a grave error. A typical scenario may play out as follows. For short-term survival, the business owner or executive decides to meet current creditors’ requirements and oblige the IRS to become a creditor. The hope is that in the medium term the business will be able to pay the IRS the delinquent taxes plus interest and penalties. Often, however, the business becomes insolvent and declares bankruptcy. In order to address this problem and avoid significant erosion of tax revenue, in 1954 Congress enacted a penalty—equal to the unpaid payroll taxes—against all responsible persons who willfully fail to collect and turn over the money.

  • http://www.anglofareast.com/research/silver-price/ silver price

    You see, if you think about it, the “trust fund” taxes are really employees money (even though, in most cases, the money may have never really existed). But the employer made a promise to pay an employee gross wages, net pay to the employee, and employee taxes to the IRS. But by not making payroll deposits, the employer is failing to honor its employment agreement. And the folks who are hurt are the IRS. They lose twice: First they don’t get the taxes. And second, they have to credit employees for tax payments their employers were required to make, but never did!

  • http://www.anglofareast.com/research/silver-price/ silver price

    Since we are deep into “tax season” this is a good time to remind those people who bought new cars in 2009 to be sure to claim the deduction for the sales tax that was paid on the purchase. The deduction is available to anyone who purchased a new car, motor home, motorcycle or truck after February 16, 2009. The deduction is limited to the tax paid on up to $49,500 of the purchase price (if you bought a car costing $60,000, only the taxes paid on the first $49,500 would be deductible).

  • http://smart-drugs.net/JamesSouth-idebenone.htm Idebenone

    You see, if you think about it, the “trust fund” taxes are really employees money (even though, in most cases, the money may have never really existed). But the employer made a promise to pay an employee gross wages, net pay to the employee, and employee taxes to the IRS. But by not making payroll deposits, the employer is failing to honor its employment agreement. And the folks who are hurt are the IRS. They lose twice: First they don’t get the taxes. And second, they have to credit employees for tax payments their employers were required to make, but never did!

  • http://www.anglofareast.com/research/gold-price/ gold price

    The FairTax proponents claim a 23% rate should suffice as far as Federal taxes go. These numbers are all estimates of course, no one really knows until actually tested. As for the effects of this tax, well, all taxes have similar effects. Just can’t avoid it. For example, there are estimated trillions of dollars outside the US because of tax reasons. Billions more would be saved from compliance costs. The underground economy is completely untaxed, which would change with the FairTax. The income tax punishes those who save money, killing savings rates. Income taxes drive away not only the biggest earners and spenders (who then can avoid paying income taxes in their country of origin), but also the productive jobs they create with their investments. As for tourism, I don’t know that price levels will change that much. Remember all the compliance costs will be gone, therefore offsetting some of the FairTax. Then you have things like payroll taxes for all the Disney World or whatever employees which will be gone. So at least in theory it shouldn’t be any worse than it already is.

  • http://www.anglofareast.com/bullion-accounts/gold-account/ gold account

    As the report explains, there are two reasons for this. First, the personal income tax has lower rates for two key types of investment income, capital gains and stock dividends. Second, investment income is exempt from payroll taxes (which will change to a small degree when the health care reform law takes effect).

  • http://smart-drugs.net/carnosine-eyedrops-testimonials.htm NAC eye drops

    The scheme involves a type of business called an “S corporation,” which is distinguished from other corporations in that its profits are not subject to the corporate income tax but are simply included in the taxable income of the owners and therefore subject to the personal income tax. These profits should also be subject to payroll taxes when they are income from work, but an odd feature of S corporations allows some “active income” (income a business owner receives as a result of being involved in the operations of the business) to be characterized as income that is not earned and thus not subject to payroll taxes.

  • http://smart-drugs.net/carnosine-eyedrops-testimonials.htm carnosine eye drops

    As the report explains, there are two reasons for this. First, the personal income tax has lower rates for two key types of investment income, capital gains and stock dividends. Second, investment income is exempt from payroll taxes (which will change to a small degree when the health care reform law takes effect).

  • http://www.anglofareast.com/bullion-accounts/silver-account/ silver account

    I own a small business and have several employees. I used to regularly collect the required payroll tax from my employees and pay it over to the government. Two years ago, my business experienced a cash flow problem. In order to meet the general business expenses, I was forced to use the sums that I had collected from my employees as payroll taxes. I hoped that as the economy improved, I would be able to generate more income and pay back the delinquent taxes. However, in the past two years I have fallen further behind and now owe tens of thousands of dollars in back taxes. Recently, I received a notice from the IRS informing that I was found to be the responsible person for these taxes. The notice said that I was now personally responsible for these delinquent business taxes. What does this mean and what should I do now?

    • jfaris

      Gives me a call at 978-621-0759. Joe Faris, CPA

  • http://irvasa.ru/novosti/ryibnyie-blyuda/skumbriya-zapechennaya-v-folge Greta V. Calderon

    The scheme involves a type of business called an “S corporation,” which is distinguished from other corporations in that its profits are not subject to the corporate income tax but are simply included in the taxable income of the owners and therefore subject to the personal income tax. These profits should also be subject to payroll taxes when they are income from work, but an odd feature of S corporations allows some “active income” (income a business owner receives as a result of being involved in the operations of the business) to be characterized as income that is not earned and thus not subject to payroll taxes.